Trust Rankings

Data-driven judicial accountability

Comprehensive trust scores for courts, judges, and clerks across the nation. Our ratings are calculated from multiple data sources including news coverage, disciplinary records, appeal reversal rates, and public complaints.

Showing 123 of 123 results
#1

California Supreme Court

State of CA, CAstate
98Excellent
Trust Score98%
Transparency83%
Efficiency72%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#2
98Excellent
Trust Score98%
Transparency75%
Efficiency89%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#3

Virginia Supreme Court

State of VA, VAstate
97Excellent
Trust Score97%
Transparency91%
Efficiency76%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#4

Colorado Supreme Court

State of CO, COstate
96Excellent
Trust Score96%
Transparency83%
Efficiency98%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#5

Georgia Supreme Court

State of GA, GAstate
95Excellent
Trust Score95%
Transparency87%
Efficiency80%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#6
94Excellent
Trust Score94%
Transparency93%
Efficiency93%
Total Cases: 29752Controversial: 99
#7
94Excellent
Trust Score94%
Transparency95%
Efficiency96%
Total Cases: 49470Controversial: 158
#8

Richard Sheppard Arnold U.S. Courthouse

E.D. Ark., Arkansasdistrict
94Excellent
Trust Score94%
Transparency90%
Efficiency92%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#9
Trust Score93%
Transparency95%
Efficiency95%
Total Cases: 9553Controversial: 369
#10
Trust Score93%
Transparency88%
Efficiency96%
Total Cases: 25696Controversial: 263
#11
92Excellent
Trust Score92%
Transparency89%
Efficiency94%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#12

Hugo L. Black U.S. Courthouse

N.D. Ala., Alabamadistrict
92Excellent
Trust Score92%
Transparency87%
Efficiency92%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#13

U.S. Federal Building and Courthouse

D. Alaska, Alaskadistrict
92Excellent
Trust Score92%
Transparency93%
Efficiency93%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#14
91Excellent
Trust Score91%
Transparency91%
Efficiency88%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#15
Trust Score91%
Transparency86%
Efficiency92%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#16

U.S. Post Office & Courthouse

W.D. Ark., Arkansasdistrict
90Excellent
Trust Score90%
Transparency88%
Efficiency93%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#17

Texas Supreme Court

State of TX, TXstate
90Excellent
Trust Score90%
Transparency78%
Efficiency77%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#18

U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

D.D.C., District of Columbiadistrict
90Excellent
Trust Score90%
Transparency89%
Efficiency93%
Total Cases: 50337Controversial: 102
#19

Ronald V. Dellums Federal Building

N.D. Cal., Californiadistrict
90Excellent
Trust Score90%
Transparency91%
Efficiency89%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#20
Trust Score90%
Transparency92%
Efficiency89%
Total Cases: 11910Controversial: 320
#21
90Excellent
Trust Score90%
Transparency91%
Efficiency87%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#22
90Excellent
Trust Score90%
Transparency87%
Efficiency86%
Total Cases: 12043Controversial: 184
#23
90Excellent
Trust Score90%
Transparency86%
Efficiency92%
Total Cases: 46902Controversial: 363
#24

James A. Walsh U.S. Courthouse

D. Ariz., Arizonadistrict
89Excellent
Trust Score89%
Transparency92%
Efficiency90%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#25
89Excellent
Trust Score89%
Transparency86%
Efficiency86%
Total Cases: 5578Controversial: 77
#26

Illinois Supreme Court

State of IL, ILstate
89Excellent
Trust Score89%
Transparency96%
Efficiency80%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#27

Wisconsin Supreme Court

State of WI, WIstate
89Excellent
Trust Score89%
Transparency84%
Efficiency81%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#28
89Excellent
Trust Score89%
Transparency89%
Efficiency89%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#29

Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse

M.D. Ala., Alabamadistrict
89Excellent
Trust Score89%
Transparency89%
Efficiency85%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#30

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

AK, AZ, CA, HI, ID, MT, NV, OR, WA, Guam, N. Mariana Islands, Californiaappellate
88Excellent
Trust Score88%
Transparency84%
Efficiency89%
Total Cases: 29961Controversial: 384
#31
88Excellent
Trust Score88%
Transparency89%
Efficiency86%
Total Cases: 45474Controversial: 442
#32

Pennsylvania Supreme Court

State of PA, PAstate
88Excellent
Trust Score88%
Transparency93%
Efficiency93%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#33

U.S. Federal Building and Courthouse

D. Alaska, Alaskadistrict
88Excellent
Trust Score88%
Transparency86%
Efficiency89%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#34

Richard H. Chambers U.S. Court of Appeals

9th Cir., Californiadistrict
88Excellent
Trust Score88%
Transparency87%
Efficiency87%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#35

Richard C. Lee U.S. Courthouse

D. Conn., Connecticutdistrict
87Excellent
Trust Score87%
Transparency90%
Efficiency86%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#36

Washington Supreme Court

State of WA, WAstate
87Excellent
Trust Score87%
Transparency79%
Efficiency91%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#37
Trust Score87%
Transparency84%
Efficiency90%
Total Cases: 41193Controversial: 504
#38

John McKinley Federal Building

N.D. Ala., Alabamadistrict
87Excellent
Trust Score87%
Transparency90%
Efficiency84%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#39
Trust Score87%
Transparency89%
Efficiency91%
Total Cases: 18117Controversial: 349
#40

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DE, NJ, PA, VI, Pennsylvaniaappellate
87Excellent
Trust Score87%
Transparency82%
Efficiency83%
Total Cases: 8036Controversial: 411
#41
86Excellent
Trust Score86%
Transparency89%
Efficiency82%
Total Cases: 24116Controversial: 59
#42

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

AR, IA, MN, MO, NE, ND, SD, Missouriappellate
86Excellent
Trust Score86%
Transparency85%
Efficiency82%
Total Cases: 38350Controversial: 241
#43

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

LA, MS, TX, Louisianaappellate
86Excellent
Trust Score86%
Transparency88%
Efficiency84%
Total Cases: 16347Controversial: 213
#44
Trust Score85%
Transparency88%
Efficiency80%
Total Cases: 38966Controversial: 117
#45

Minnesota Supreme Court

State of MN, MNstate
84Excellent
Trust Score84%
Transparency99%
Efficiency93%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#46
84Excellent
Trust Score84%
Transparency79%
Efficiency85%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#47

Sandra Day O'Connor U.S. Courthouse

D. Ariz., Arizonadistrict
84Excellent
Trust Score84%
Transparency82%
Efficiency84%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#48

U.S. Courthouse and Post Office

N.D. Ala., Alabamadistrict
84Excellent
Trust Score84%
Transparency88%
Efficiency80%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#49
Trust Score84%
Transparency83%
Efficiency79%
Total Cases: 15642Controversial: 334
#50

Supreme Court of the United States

Federal, District of Columbiasupreme
84Excellent
Trust Score84%
Transparency86%
Efficiency79%
Total Cases: 47053Controversial: 224
#51
83Excellent
Trust Score83%
Transparency84%
Efficiency80%
Total Cases: 46823Controversial: 256
#52
83Excellent
Trust Score83%
Transparency78%
Efficiency79%
Total Cases: 26685Controversial: 434
#53

U.S. Post Office & Courthouse

D. Ariz., Arizonadistrict
83Excellent
Trust Score83%
Transparency87%
Efficiency81%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#54
83Excellent
Trust Score83%
Transparency80%
Efficiency78%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#55

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

District of Columbia, District of Columbiaappellate
83Excellent
Trust Score83%
Transparency82%
Efficiency86%
Total Cases: 40774Controversial: 158
#56
82Excellent
Trust Score82%
Transparency81%
Efficiency79%
Total Cases: 33826Controversial: 390
#57
Trust Score82%
Transparency77%
Efficiency83%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#58
Trust Score81%
Transparency78%
Efficiency84%
Total Cases: 41744Controversial: 201
#59

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

CO, KS, NM, OK, UT, WY, Coloradoappellate
81Excellent
Trust Score81%
Transparency85%
Efficiency81%
Total Cases: 42098Controversial: 404
#60

Arizona Supreme Court

State of AZ, AZstate
81Excellent
Trust Score81%
Transparency84%
Efficiency93%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#61

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

ME, MA, NH, RI, PR, Massachusettsappellate
80Excellent
Trust Score80%
Transparency83%
Efficiency80%
Total Cases: 10813Controversial: 359
#62

Robert E. Coyle U.S. Courthouse

E.D. Cal., Californiadistrict
80Excellent
Trust Score80%
Transparency83%
Efficiency75%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#63
80Excellent
Trust Score80%
Transparency84%
Efficiency77%
Total Cases: 16878Controversial: 293
#64
Trust Score79%
Transparency81%
Efficiency83%
Total Cases: 52422Controversial: 117
#65

Abraham A. Ribicoff Federal Building

D. Conn., Connecticutdistrict
79Good
Trust Score79%
Transparency77%
Efficiency83%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#66

Florida Supreme Court

State of FL, FLstate
79Good
Trust Score79%
Transparency84%
Efficiency81%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#67

Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse

N.D. Ala., Alabamadistrict
78Good
Trust Score78%
Transparency82%
Efficiency81%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#68
Trust Score78%
Transparency74%
Efficiency77%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#69

North Carolina Supreme Court

State of NC, NCstate
77Good
Trust Score77%
Transparency82%
Efficiency96%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#70
Trust Score77%
Transparency75%
Efficiency79%
Total Cases: 17948Controversial: 186
#71

John Archibald Campbell U.S. Courthouse

U. S. Bankruptcy, Alabamadistrict
76Good
Trust Score76%
Transparency75%
Efficiency76%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#72

U.S. Federal Building and Courthouse

N.D. Ala., Alabamadistrict
76Good
Trust Score76%
Transparency72%
Efficiency74%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#73

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

KY, MI, OH, TN, Ohioappellate
76Good
Trust Score76%
Transparency75%
Efficiency74%
Total Cases: 48214Controversial: 51
#74

Ohio Supreme Court

State of OH, OHstate
76Good
Trust Score76%
Transparency88%
Efficiency99%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#75
Trust Score76%
Transparency73%
Efficiency73%
Total Cases: 14148Controversial: 316
#76
Trust Score76%
Transparency75%
Efficiency74%
Total Cases: 51808Controversial: 106
#77

New Jersey Supreme Court

State of NJ, NJstate
75Good
Trust Score75%
Transparency79%
Efficiency88%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#78
Trust Score75%
Transparency73%
Efficiency76%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#79
75Good
Trust Score75%
Transparency79%
Efficiency70%
Total Cases: 50004Controversial: 175
#80

U.S. District Court

E.D. Cal., Californiadistrict
74Good
Trust Score74%
Transparency73%
Efficiency69%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#81
74Good
Trust Score74%
Transparency76%
Efficiency69%
Total Cases: 48117Controversial: 514
#82

Evo A. DeConcini U.S. Courthouse

D. Ariz., Arizonadistrict
73Good
Trust Score73%
Transparency71%
Efficiency75%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#83

Mobile Federal Courthouse

S.D. Ala., Alabamadistrict
73Good
Trust Score73%
Transparency76%
Efficiency73%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#84

Judge Isaac C. Parker Federal Building

W.D. Ark., Arkansasdistrict
72Good
Trust Score72%
Transparency71%
Efficiency67%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#85
Trust Score72%
Transparency72%
Efficiency74%
Total Cases: 18935Controversial: 474
#86

John M. Roll U.S. Courthouse

D. Ariz., Arizonadistrict
72Good
Trust Score72%
Transparency72%
Efficiency76%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#87

Michigan Supreme Court

State of MI, MIstate
72Good
Trust Score72%
Transparency90%
Efficiency92%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#88
Trust Score72%
Transparency73%
Efficiency74%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#89
Trust Score72%
Transparency72%
Efficiency68%
Total Cases: 44556Controversial: 417
#90

Federal Building & U.S. Courthouse

S.D. Ala., Alabamadistrict
71Good
Trust Score71%
Transparency72%
Efficiency66%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#91

New York Court of Appeals

State of NY, NYstate
71Good
Trust Score71%
Transparency94%
Efficiency78%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#92

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

MD, NC, SC, VA, WV, Virginiaappellate
71Good
Trust Score71%
Transparency72%
Efficiency70%
Total Cases: 28971Controversial: 391
#93

Wayne N. Aspinall Federal Building

D. Col., Coloradodistrict
70Good
Trust Score70%
Transparency74%
Efficiency66%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#94
Trust Score70%
Transparency70%
Efficiency72%
Total Cases: 52190Controversial: 62
#95

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Nationwide (patents, trade, claims), District of Columbiaappellate
70Good
Trust Score70%
Transparency70%
Efficiency68%
Total Cases: 14960Controversial: 208
#96
Trust Score70%
Transparency69%
Efficiency74%
Total Cases: 5079Controversial: 270
#97

Jacob Weinberger U.S. Courthouse

S.D. Cal., Californiadistrict
67Good
Trust Score67%
Transparency71%
Efficiency65%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#98

U.S. Customhouse

D. Col., Coloradodistrict
66Good
Trust Score66%
Transparency62%
Efficiency69%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#99
64Good
Trust Score64%
Transparency60%
Efficiency68%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#100

U.S. Courthouse

C.D. Cal., Californiadistrict
64Good
Trust Score64%
Transparency65%
Efficiency63%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#101

Robert T. Matsui U.S. Courthouse

E.D. Cal., Californiadistrict
64Good
Trust Score64%
Transparency65%
Efficiency68%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#102

Ketchikan Federal Building

D. Alaska, Alaskadistrict
62Good
Trust Score62%
Transparency62%
Efficiency57%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#103

Edward J. Schwartz Courthouse

S.D. Cal., Californiadistrict
60Good
Trust Score60%
Transparency56%
Efficiency64%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#104

Federal Building

D. Ariz., Arizonadistrict
60Good
Trust Score60%
Transparency57%
Efficiency63%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#105
Trust Score50%
Transparency50%
Efficiency50%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#106
Trust Score50%
Transparency50%
Efficiency50%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#107
Trust Score50%
Transparency50%
Efficiency50%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#108
Trust Score50%
Transparency50%
Efficiency50%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#109
Trust Score50%
Transparency50%
Efficiency50%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#110
Trust Score50%
Transparency50%
Efficiency50%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#111
Trust Score50%
Transparency50%
Efficiency50%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#112
Trust Score50%
Transparency50%
Efficiency50%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#113
Trust Score50%
Transparency50%
Efficiency50%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#114
Trust Score50%
Transparency50%
Efficiency50%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#115
Trust Score50%
Transparency50%
Efficiency50%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#116
Trust Score50%
Transparency50%
Efficiency50%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#117
Trust Score50%
Transparency50%
Efficiency50%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#118
Trust Score50%
Transparency50%
Efficiency50%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#119
Trust Score50%
Transparency50%
Efficiency50%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#120
Trust Score50%
Transparency50%
Efficiency50%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#121
Trust Score50%
Transparency50%
Efficiency50%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#122
Trust Score50%
Transparency50%
Efficiency50%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0
#123
Trust Score50%
Transparency50%
Efficiency50%
Total Cases: 0Controversial: 0

How We Calculate Trust Scores

25%

News Analysis

Negative and positive coverage from verified news sources

25%

Disciplinary Records

Bar complaints and official disciplinary actions

25%

Appeal Reversals

Rate of decisions overturned on appeal

25%

Public Reviews

Ratings from legal platforms and public feedback